In Hindsight, Did the FBI Hurt or Help Hillary in 2016?
Campaign buttons at an election-watch event at the U.S. consulate in Sydney, Australia, Nov. 9, 2016.
Photo:
David Gray/REUTERS
Holman Jenkins, Jr., suggests that the FBI cost Hillary Clinton the 2016 election by not keeping its actions confidential in its investigation of her (“Durham Jury Convicts the FBI,” Business World, June 1). Given what we now know from the Michael Sussmann trial, Mrs. Clinton should be thanking her lucky stars the FBI looked the other way on her campaign’s conjured Russia-collusion hoax, which a reasonable person might find criminal. The real mystery in this perfidious tale is why the FBI decided to advance the dossier hoax to the world, thus weakening America and its presidency. Perhaps
James Comey
can explain the logic behind it in his next book?
Phillip Ruland
Newport Beach, Calif.
Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Read More: In Hindsight, Did the FBI Hurt or Help Hillary in 2016?