Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas D’Agostino Sr.: Difference between
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* ”’Keep”’ per Pburka’s comments on sourcing. [[User:Walt Yoder|Walt Yoder]] ([[User talk:Walt Yoder|talk]]) 18:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC) |
* ”’Keep”’ per Pburka’s comments on sourcing. [[User:Walt Yoder|Walt Yoder]] ([[User talk:Walt Yoder|talk]]) 18:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
* ”’Merge with [[D’Agostino Supermarkets]]”’: The only two IS RS are the Routledge encyclopedia article and the NYT Obit, which depends heavily on the Routledge article, so basically one encyclopedia entry. I don’t think this is enough for a standalone article, especially when the content will fit so well into the target. This seems like an unneeded CFORK, only makes readers chase links. I tried to clean up the article and added inline citations. // [[User:TimothyBlue|Timothy]] :: [[User talk:TimothyBlue|talk]] 10:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC) |
* ”’Merge with [[D’Agostino Supermarkets]]”’: The only two IS RS are the Routledge encyclopedia article and the NYT Obit, which depends heavily on the Routledge article, so basically one encyclopedia entry. I don’t think this is enough for a standalone article, especially when the content will fit so well into the target. This seems like an unneeded CFORK, only makes readers chase links. I tried to clean up the article and added inline citations. // [[User:TimothyBlue|Timothy]] :: [[User talk:TimothyBlue|talk]] 10:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
*”’Keep”’ – boomers and Gen Xers in the NYC metropolitan area will remember his TV commercials and charity work. That and the ”Times” obit push him over notability. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 01:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:45, 19 April 2023
Nicholas D’Agostino Sr.[edit]
- Nicholas D’Agostino Sr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)
Subject doesn’t meet GNG. All the sources are obituaries, and are routine or minor/non-significant coverage. Suggest merging contents into D’Agostino Supermarkets that the subject founded and does have obvious notability. Macktheknifeau (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. Macktheknifeau (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Italy and New York. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. A by-lined obituary in the New York Times is a pretty solid indication of notability and far from routine. So is the entry in the Routledge Italian American encyclopedia. pburka (talk) 19:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Pburka’s comments on sourcing. Walt Yoder (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Merge with D’Agostino Supermarkets: The only two IS RS are the Routledge encyclopedia article and the NYT Obit, which depends heavily on the Routledge article, so basically one encyclopedia entry. I don’t think this is enough for a standalone article, especially when the content will fit so well into the target. This seems like an unneeded CFORK, only makes readers chase links. I tried to clean up the article and added inline citations. // Timothy :: talk 10:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep – boomers and Gen Xers in the NYC metropolitan area will remember his TV commercials and charity work. That and the Times obit push him over notability. Bearian (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Read More: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas D’Agostino Sr.: Difference between